<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upphovsrättens smutsiga tillkomst, del 1 av 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/</link>
	<description>Diskussioner om infopolitik och medborgarrätt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:53:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Upphovsfel &#171; Full Mental Straightjacket</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-41785</link>
		<dc:creator>Upphovsfel &#171; Full Mental Straightjacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-41785</guid>
		<description>[...] Upphovsrättens smutsiga tillkomst, del 1 av 2 Upphovsrättens smutsiga tillkomst, del 2 av 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Upphovsrättens smutsiga tillkomst, del 1 av 2 Upphovsrättens smutsiga tillkomst, del 2 av 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enligt Min Humla &#187; Burn her!</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-35976</link>
		<dc:creator>Enligt Min Humla &#187; Burn her!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-35976</guid>
		<description>[...] Company of Stationers and Newspaper Makers. Ordet &#8220;copyright&#8221; har nämligen sitt ursprung i ett monopol som utfärdades av den brittiska kronan till tryckargillet The Worshipful Company of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Company of Stationers and Newspaper Makers. Ordet &#8220;copyright&#8221; har nämligen sitt ursprung i ett monopol som utfärdades av den brittiska kronan till tryckargillet The Worshipful Company of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent de verdier</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-32658</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent de verdier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-32658</guid>
		<description>Undra hur många av de som försvarar upphovsrätten som känner till detta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undra hur många av de som försvarar upphovsrätten som känner till detta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varför kultur? &#171; Fritänk</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-30479</link>
		<dc:creator>Varför kultur? &#171; Fritänk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-30479</guid>
		<description>[...] en rätt ny företeelse men kultur har skapats längre än vad IFPI (ca 75 år) eller upphovsrätt (ca 450 år). Själva ordet kultur har gamla anor. Ordet kommer från latinets cultus som betyder odling. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en rätt ny företeelse men kultur har skapats längre än vad IFPI (ca 75 år) eller upphovsrätt (ca 450 år). Själva ordet kultur har gamla anor. Ordet kommer från latinets cultus som betyder odling. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1900-talets viktigaste uppfinning? &#171; Fritänk</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-28877</link>
		<dc:creator>1900-talets viktigaste uppfinning? &#171; Fritänk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-28877</guid>
		<description>[...] sin position hotad av den nya tekniken och försökte på alla sätt begränsa den. Ett sätt var införandet av upphovsrätt som från början var ett sätt att dela ut licenser och privilegier till av makten godkända [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sin position hotad av den nya tekniken och försökte på alla sätt begränsa den. Ett sätt var införandet av upphovsrätt som från början var ett sätt att dela ut licenser och privilegier till av makten godkända [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagor från livbåten &#187; Bloggarkiv &#187; Tillbaka till lägerelden - cirkeln är sluten</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-27735</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagor från livbåten &#187; Bloggarkiv &#187; Tillbaka till lägerelden - cirkeln är sluten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-27735</guid>
		<description>[...] och tankar om romanen som dagens författare jämförs eller brottas med. Under denna period såg också den moderna upphovsrätten sitt ljus. Tidningsägare och tryckare skulle inte kunna profitera på [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] och tankar om romanen som dagens författare jämförs eller brottas med. Under denna period såg också den moderna upphovsrätten sitt ljus. Tidningsägare och tryckare skulle inte kunna profitera på [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calle Rehbinder</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-19350</link>
		<dc:creator>Calle Rehbinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-19350</guid>
		<description>Otroligt intressant artikel!

Tack för den länken i din senaste bloggpost!

&lt;em&gt;Calle Rehbinders senaste bloggpost: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tantrikblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/16/cirkus-%C2%A9-copyright-rattegangen-mot-pirate-bay-har-borjat/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cirkus © Copyright - rättegången mot Pirate Bay har börjat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Otroligt intressant artikel!</p>
<p>Tack för den länken i din senaste bloggpost!</p>
<p><em>Calle Rehbinders senaste bloggpost: <a href="http://tantrikblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/16/cirkus-%C2%A9-copyright-rattegangen-mot-pirate-bay-har-borjat/" rel="nofollow">Cirkus © Copyright &#8211; rättegången mot Pirate Bay har börjat</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Falkvinge (PP) &#187; Märkbar svängning i gammelmedia</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-18536</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Falkvinge (PP) &#187; Märkbar svängning i gammelmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-18536</guid>
		<description>[...] den 4 maj 1557, och Shakespeare föddes 1564. Men de har rätt i princip, eftersom upphovsrätten som den såg ut då inte påverkade Shakespeare det allra minsta, och mycket riktigt hade Shakespeare inte upphovsrätt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] den 4 maj 1557, och Shakespeare föddes 1564. Men de har rätt i princip, eftersom upphovsrätten som den såg ut då inte påverkade Shakespeare det allra minsta, och mycket riktigt hade Shakespeare inte upphovsrätt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Falkvinge (pp) &#187; Antipiratlagen IPRED1: Perverterad upphovsrätt</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-12960</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Falkvinge (pp) &#187; Antipiratlagen IPRED1: Perverterad upphovsrätt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-12960</guid>
		<description>[...] började som en repressionsmekanism mot politiska dissidenter den 4 maj 1557. Den ändamålsgled ordentligt i samband med amerikanska frigörelsekriget, och fick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] började som en repressionsmekanism mot politiska dissidenter den 4 maj 1557. Den ändamålsgled ordentligt i samband med amerikanska frigörelsekriget, och fick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fokus &#187; Måndagsläsning 3/11–08</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-12789</link>
		<dc:creator>Fokus &#187; Måndagsläsning 3/11–08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-12789</guid>
		<description>[...] med att förklara. Snarare är upphovsrätt en form av ensamrätt, läs gärna Ricks historik om upphovsrättens uppkomst om du vill veta mer. Till exempel är det nog många som upplever sig äga olika former av någon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] med att förklara. Snarare är upphovsrätt en form av ensamrätt, läs gärna Ricks historik om upphovsrättens uppkomst om du vill veta mer. Till exempel är det nog många som upplever sig äga olika former av någon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opassande &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fyra små rätter &#8212; upphovsrätt, äganderätt, ensamrätt och allemansrätt</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-12719</link>
		<dc:creator>opassande &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fyra små rätter &#8212; upphovsrätt, äganderätt, ensamrätt och allemansrätt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-12719</guid>
		<description>[...] med att förklara. Snarare är upphovsrätt en form av ensamrätt, läs gärna Ricks historik om upphovsrättens uppkomst om du vill veta mer. Till exempel är det nog många som upplever sig äga olika former av någon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] med att förklara. Snarare är upphovsrätt en form av ensamrätt, läs gärna Ricks historik om upphovsrättens uppkomst om du vill veta mer. Till exempel är det nog många som upplever sig äga olika former av någon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opassande &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Almedalsrapport: Hybrism och internetgurus</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-6681</link>
		<dc:creator>opassande &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Almedalsrapport: Hybrism och internetgurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-6681</guid>
		<description>[...] Piratpartiet hade bokat in för seminarium idag på förmiddagen, med inga mindre än Oscar Swartz, internetguru och bloggare samt Mattias Lövkvist &#8212; den nya tidens skivbolagsdirektör. Ämnet var &#8220;Upphovsrätt eller medborgarrätt&#8221;, och Rick Falkvinge deltog i panelen dessutom, med en ingående redovisning av upphovsrättens historia. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Piratpartiet hade bokat in för seminarium idag på förmiddagen, med inga mindre än Oscar Swartz, internetguru och bloggare samt Mattias Lövkvist &#8212; den nya tidens skivbolagsdirektör. Ämnet var &#8220;Upphovsrätt eller medborgarrätt&#8221;, och Rick Falkvinge deltog i panelen dessutom, med en ingående redovisning av upphovsrättens historia. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enligt Min Humla &#187; Sanningen om De Fyras plötsliga omsorg om upphovsmännen</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-2453</link>
		<dc:creator>Enligt Min Humla &#187; Sanningen om De Fyras plötsliga omsorg om upphovsmännen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-2453</guid>
		<description>[...] är inte för upphovsmännen, något som Rick Falkvinge visat med en historisk genomgång. Jag rekommenderar alla att läsa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] är inte för upphovsmännen, något som Rick Falkvinge visat med en historisk genomgång. Jag rekommenderar alla att läsa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Falkvinge (pp) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Internet, tryckpressen och yttrandefrihet</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Falkvinge (pp) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Internet, tryckpressen och yttrandefrihet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 08:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>[...] kom på 1450-talet innebar det en otrolig yttrandefrihetsrevolution. Precis som jag skrev i min exposé över upphovsrättens historia, så innebar det att alla - och inte bara prästerskapet - plötsligt kunde få ut sina idéer och [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kom på 1450-talet innebar det en otrolig yttrandefrihetsrevolution. Precis som jag skrev i min exposé över upphovsrättens historia, så innebar det att alla &#8211; och inte bara prästerskapet &#8211; plötsligt kunde få ut sina idéer och [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Falkvinge, pirate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Copyright&#8217;s shameful origins, part 1 of 2</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-2044</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Falkvinge, pirate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Copyright&#8217;s shameful origins, part 1 of 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 09:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-2044</guid>
		<description>[...] post was originally written in Swedish and kindly translated by a reader named Hans. Gratitudes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post was originally written in Swedish and kindly translated by a reader named Hans. Gratitudes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Falkvinge</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-2034</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Falkvinge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 09:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-2034</guid>
		<description>Jag upptäckte just att mitt tack till Hans som jag postade här försvann i en databaskrasch. Tack, Hans. Postar på engelska nu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jag upptäckte just att mitt tack till Hans som jag postade här försvann i en databaskrasch. Tack, Hans. Postar på engelska nu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Nilsson</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Nilsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>Mycket bra skrivet.

&quot;Den som har kunskap har makt, makt att förändra sitt eget och andras liv.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mycket bra skrivet.</p>
<p>&#8220;Den som har kunskap har makt, makt att förändra sitt eget och andras liv.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-1894</guid>
		<description>Without any kind of permission from the original author i took the liberty of translating this into english using the best of my abilities. Note that there may be errors, in fact its even likely that i have failed to correctly translate one or more parts of the text. Some parts are even marked with questionmarks because i could not find the apropriate words. Never the less. Here is my quick and dirty translated english version of the text. Do with it whatever you like...

-----------

Many believe that copyright came to be as a result of great insight and almost ???Salomonian??? wisdom in order to create a beneficial climate for culture, both to help poor artists and also to make sure that the masses could enjoy more music, culture and lively happiness.

The truth is as far from that as one could ever imagine.

Copyright (and now i&#039;m talking about the economic copyright, not the &quot;credit where credit is due&quot;) was created as an instrument for censorship against political ????dissidents??? in a time when those were viciously hunted - especially those who confessed to the wtrong religion (the protestants). Many were executed. Others fled the country. Copyright was there to make sure that they could not communicate or reach out with their message. And this was not a side effect, it was the main purpose.

(One might want to keep this in mind the next time anyone claims that copyright is a necessity for freedom of speech, as one swedish politician did quite recently.)

The story begins with Henry VIII. British king. Most people have heard of him. He grew up as a catholic but did not care much for religion at all, he was more interrested in sex. He married a woman named Catherine of Aragon, and they had a daughter, Mary. He eventually grew tired of his marriage and wanted to get divorced, however since Catherine was almost like a protégé of the pope himself, catholic Rome would not allow such a thing.

Henry VIII&#039;s answer to this was quite pragmatic. He gave Rome the ginger, made all of England protestant instead and could then divorce without trouble. He then proceeded to marry five other women and had so many mistresses that historians from time to time still fight about their numbers. In his many marriages, he had one other daughter who reached an adult age, Elizabeth.

Both daughters would eventually succeed him on the throne.

During roughly the same time period printing presses made their first appearences in europe. It is unknown exactly when the first printing press was considered to be finished, but i was some time during the early 1450s. In the year 1480 there was 110 printing presses in Europe whereof 50 was in Italy. The first one arrived in England around 1485.

At this time the concept of copyright simply did not exist. Earlier, if one wanted to copy a certain writing - or manuscript as it was called then (&quot;handwritten script&quot;) - one had to place an order with a ????skriftställare????. The craftsman would close to never produce an exact copy. He would take the opportunity to correct a spelling error here, perhaps introduce an error of his own there, correct facts for noble or not so noble reasons, etc. So when it was suddenly possible to produce tens of thousands of exact copies it was very new and exciting. Everybody were able to publish themselves and so they did. Everybody could could afford it printed everything they could get their hands on. Gallilei. Socrates. Poem collections.

Plagiary - to put ones own name on the work of someone else - did occur. Reversed plagiary - to put the name of a more famous author on your own work in order to have it spread better - was even more common. (See Uncyclopedias article about &quot;how to fabricate a quote by Oscar Wilde&quot;.) In conclution the printing situation was pretty chaotic. Copyright did not exist.

In the year 1553 Queen Mary I became the ruler. She was the daughter of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon, Catherine who had been robbed of her title as queen, first to become a princess and later just lady. Mary was not entierly happy with the way her mother had been treated and in particular she was not very happy at all with the fact that the king had made England protestant in order to be able to get divorced. Mary was a proper catholic and took it as her mission to put things back in order.

She initiated a ruthless hunt and slaughter of protestants in the country. Around 300 prominent protestants were executed. The families that could afford it, around 800, fled the country. Far more than that were imprisoned. Her brutality earned her the nickname Bloody Mary.

She was also upset by the way the protestants could get their message out through the new printing presses outside of the crowns and the churches control, but she realized that she could not destroy this opportunity with only the help of the crowns armed men. She needed an ally within the printing industry so she went to londons printing guild - London Company of Stationers - and offered them a deal: they would only print what the crown approved and in return they would get a complete monopoly on printing equipment as well as the lawful right to claim as their own all such equipment in the ownership of somebody else. They would also obtain the right to burn all books that was not printed by Stationers.

Stationers happily agreed because this ment a guaranteed clientele on a highly demanded service. On May 4 1557 they got their ????privilegiebrev??? with the monopoly rights. This also meant that they were made the private censoring agency for the crown and they recieved the full popularity associated with that as well.

Mary was not very successful in her attempts to crush protestantism. She actually died one year later, in 1558, and was succeeded by Queen Elizabeth I. Not only was Elizabeth a protestant, she is also considered one of Englands greates rulers of all times, even today, 500 years later. On the other hand Queen Marys repressive censoring construct remains in effect up until today under the name copyright.

The word itself has its origins in an internal mechanism within the printing press guild. The members within the guild had their own agreements about who had the right to print (&quot;copy&quot;) which scripts, and this was entered into a huge ledger at the London Company of Stationers. Not only did they possess a monopoly as a group in other words. They also had a cartell within the monopoly. In any case it was said internally within the guild that a certain printer had the copyright for a certain script.

One hundred and fifty years later the winds of change were blowing through Europe. A thing called freedom of printing??? had become quite popular and in the year 1688 there was a short but intensive revolution in Brittain. History knows it as &quot;Glorious Revolution&quot; (isn&#039;t it interresting how the winners always write history?). It has also been called &quot;Bloodless Revolution&quot;, a title which ignores the fact that there was at least three big battles in Scotland and some major blood spill in Ireland.

Without discussing the war itself too much one of the results thereof was that parliment got more power at the expense of the crown. The new members of parliment was largely made up those who had earlier been censored by the Stationers - and they were not at all pleased with the concept. Thus the new parliment announced that London Company of Stationers&#039; monopoly and censoring privilegies would be revoked and freedom of printing???? would once again be introduced in Great Brittain, as it had been before Queen Mary I.

And what happened next shall be dealt with in the next part of this post. You are welcome to continue reading over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without any kind of permission from the original author i took the liberty of translating this into english using the best of my abilities. Note that there may be errors, in fact its even likely that i have failed to correctly translate one or more parts of the text. Some parts are even marked with questionmarks because i could not find the apropriate words. Never the less. Here is my quick and dirty translated english version of the text. Do with it whatever you like&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Many believe that copyright came to be as a result of great insight and almost ???Salomonian??? wisdom in order to create a beneficial climate for culture, both to help poor artists and also to make sure that the masses could enjoy more music, culture and lively happiness.</p>
<p>The truth is as far from that as one could ever imagine.</p>
<p>Copyright (and now i&#8217;m talking about the economic copyright, not the &#8220;credit where credit is due&#8221;) was created as an instrument for censorship against political ????dissidents??? in a time when those were viciously hunted &#8211; especially those who confessed to the wtrong religion (the protestants). Many were executed. Others fled the country. Copyright was there to make sure that they could not communicate or reach out with their message. And this was not a side effect, it was the main purpose.</p>
<p>(One might want to keep this in mind the next time anyone claims that copyright is a necessity for freedom of speech, as one swedish politician did quite recently.)</p>
<p>The story begins with Henry VIII. British king. Most people have heard of him. He grew up as a catholic but did not care much for religion at all, he was more interrested in sex. He married a woman named Catherine of Aragon, and they had a daughter, Mary. He eventually grew tired of his marriage and wanted to get divorced, however since Catherine was almost like a protégé of the pope himself, catholic Rome would not allow such a thing.</p>
<p>Henry VIII&#8217;s answer to this was quite pragmatic. He gave Rome the ginger, made all of England protestant instead and could then divorce without trouble. He then proceeded to marry five other women and had so many mistresses that historians from time to time still fight about their numbers. In his many marriages, he had one other daughter who reached an adult age, Elizabeth.</p>
<p>Both daughters would eventually succeed him on the throne.</p>
<p>During roughly the same time period printing presses made their first appearences in europe. It is unknown exactly when the first printing press was considered to be finished, but i was some time during the early 1450s. In the year 1480 there was 110 printing presses in Europe whereof 50 was in Italy. The first one arrived in England around 1485.</p>
<p>At this time the concept of copyright simply did not exist. Earlier, if one wanted to copy a certain writing &#8211; or manuscript as it was called then (&#8221;handwritten script&#8221;) &#8211; one had to place an order with a ????skriftställare????. The craftsman would close to never produce an exact copy. He would take the opportunity to correct a spelling error here, perhaps introduce an error of his own there, correct facts for noble or not so noble reasons, etc. So when it was suddenly possible to produce tens of thousands of exact copies it was very new and exciting. Everybody were able to publish themselves and so they did. Everybody could could afford it printed everything they could get their hands on. Gallilei. Socrates. Poem collections.</p>
<p>Plagiary &#8211; to put ones own name on the work of someone else &#8211; did occur. Reversed plagiary &#8211; to put the name of a more famous author on your own work in order to have it spread better &#8211; was even more common. (See Uncyclopedias article about &#8220;how to fabricate a quote by Oscar Wilde&#8221;.) In conclution the printing situation was pretty chaotic. Copyright did not exist.</p>
<p>In the year 1553 Queen Mary I became the ruler. She was the daughter of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon, Catherine who had been robbed of her title as queen, first to become a princess and later just lady. Mary was not entierly happy with the way her mother had been treated and in particular she was not very happy at all with the fact that the king had made England protestant in order to be able to get divorced. Mary was a proper catholic and took it as her mission to put things back in order.</p>
<p>She initiated a ruthless hunt and slaughter of protestants in the country. Around 300 prominent protestants were executed. The families that could afford it, around 800, fled the country. Far more than that were imprisoned. Her brutality earned her the nickname Bloody Mary.</p>
<p>She was also upset by the way the protestants could get their message out through the new printing presses outside of the crowns and the churches control, but she realized that she could not destroy this opportunity with only the help of the crowns armed men. She needed an ally within the printing industry so she went to londons printing guild &#8211; London Company of Stationers &#8211; and offered them a deal: they would only print what the crown approved and in return they would get a complete monopoly on printing equipment as well as the lawful right to claim as their own all such equipment in the ownership of somebody else. They would also obtain the right to burn all books that was not printed by Stationers.</p>
<p>Stationers happily agreed because this ment a guaranteed clientele on a highly demanded service. On May 4 1557 they got their ????privilegiebrev??? with the monopoly rights. This also meant that they were made the private censoring agency for the crown and they recieved the full popularity associated with that as well.</p>
<p>Mary was not very successful in her attempts to crush protestantism. She actually died one year later, in 1558, and was succeeded by Queen Elizabeth I. Not only was Elizabeth a protestant, she is also considered one of Englands greates rulers of all times, even today, 500 years later. On the other hand Queen Marys repressive censoring construct remains in effect up until today under the name copyright.</p>
<p>The word itself has its origins in an internal mechanism within the printing press guild. The members within the guild had their own agreements about who had the right to print (&#8221;copy&#8221;) which scripts, and this was entered into a huge ledger at the London Company of Stationers. Not only did they possess a monopoly as a group in other words. They also had a cartell within the monopoly. In any case it was said internally within the guild that a certain printer had the copyright for a certain script.</p>
<p>One hundred and fifty years later the winds of change were blowing through Europe. A thing called freedom of printing??? had become quite popular and in the year 1688 there was a short but intensive revolution in Brittain. History knows it as &#8220;Glorious Revolution&#8221; (isn&#8217;t it interresting how the winners always write history?). It has also been called &#8220;Bloodless Revolution&#8221;, a title which ignores the fact that there was at least three big battles in Scotland and some major blood spill in Ireland.</p>
<p>Without discussing the war itself too much one of the results thereof was that parliment got more power at the expense of the crown. The new members of parliment was largely made up those who had earlier been censored by the Stationers &#8211; and they were not at all pleased with the concept. Thus the new parliment announced that London Company of Stationers&#8217; monopoly and censoring privilegies would be revoked and freedom of printing???? would once again be introduced in Great Brittain, as it had been before Queen Mary I.</p>
<p>And what happened next shall be dealt with in the next part of this post. You are welcome to continue reading over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Falkvinge (pp) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Upphovsrättens smutsiga tillkomst, del 2 av 2</title>
		<link>http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Falkvinge (pp) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Upphovsrättens smutsiga tillkomst, del 2 av 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickfalkvinge.se/2008/04/21/upphovsrattens-smutsiga-tillkomst-del-1-av-2/#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>[...] skrev jag första delen i hur upphovsrätten kom till &#8212; om historien kring hur Queen Mary I skoningslöst förföljde protestanter, och instiftade [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] skrev jag första delen i hur upphovsrätten kom till &#8212; om historien kring hur Queen Mary I skoningslöst förföljde protestanter, och instiftade [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
